On-chain auditRobinhood Chain · Pons v2Aug 3 - Sep 15, 2026

Pons arbitrage booked $2.48M on Robinhood Chain

Pons made more than half a million tokens in six weeks. Only a thin slice reached enough DEX pools for arbitrage, but that slice fed more than 600,000 trades. We traced the pools, the fees and the money that left the swaps.

At a glance
Pons v2 tokens fed 637,257 priced cross-pool trades on Robinhood Chain. Their swaps booked $2.48 million in gross surplus. Sender fees took $138,848, leaving $2.34 million. Those sums describe the swaps. Direct sends inside the same tx can cut what the trader kept.
637,257
Priced trades that passed every test
$2.48M
Gross swap surplus
$2.34M
Swap surplus after sender fees
3,527
Pons tokens in the final set

01 · The marketHalf a million launches made a new DEX hunt

Pons turns one wallet call into a new coin and a bonding curve. Buyers trade on that curve until the coin has enough backing to move into a public DEX pool. Our first Pons study found a cheap launch loop that was making coins by the thousand.

The next phase starts after a coin leaves its curve. The same token can trade in several pools, each with its own price. A bot can buy from the cheaper pool and sell into the higher-priced one in the same tx. We call the amount left inside the swaps the swap surplus.

Robinhood Chain is young, and so is this market. Yet the Pons flow made enough small pools for bots to run the same search hundreds of thousands of times.

Only seven Pons coins in every thousand reached the final trade set.

02 · The testHow a Pons trade entered the count

We began with every verified Pons v2 coin. We then looked for txs that bought and sold the same coin across at least two public pools.

The Pons curve did not count as a public pool. We removed those trades so the study would cover only cross-pool DEX arbitrage.

A trade then had to pass two checks. First, the bot had to get back every token it spent and finish with more of at least one token. Second, the dollar gain could not be larger than the sum put into the trade.

Those rules cut bad price reads and incomplete swaps. We used the same core check in our five-chain arbitrage study.

03 · The funnelThree million leads became 637,257 trades

Most Pons coins never reached the market needed for this kind of trade. Fewer than one in forty made it to two outside pools. Fewer still passed the price and balance checks.

StageCount
Verified Pons v2 launches506,234
Tokens seen on an outside DEX pool12,392
Tokens seen on at least two pools8,376
Same-token cross-pool txs3,045,051
Txs that passed the token balance test1,345,143
Priced txs that passed the cash test637,257

The final set covered fewer than one coin in a hundred. Dead coins stayed in the launch count. That keeps the result from picking only the coins that survived.

04 · The moneyThe median trade booked fifty cents

The final set booked just under two and a half million dollars before the sender fee. The fee cut about one dollar in eighteen from the sum.

Priced trade setResult
Gross swap surplus$2,476,872
Sender fees$138,848
Swap surplus less sender fee$2,338,024
Cash put into the trades$61,550,898
Gross surplus as a share of cash4.02%
Share after the sender fee3.80%
Median gross surplus$0.50
Median surplus less fee$0.33

The median trade, the one in the middle when all trades are lined up, booked fifty cents before the fee. Almost all stayed above zero after that fee. Software can run a cheap loop many times, so a tiny gain can still be worth taking.

The cash sum is a flow measure. A bot can reuse the same funds in many txs. It should not be read as the amount that bots had locked at one time.

05 · The riseSeptember carried most of the total

The market was small through much of August. It rose fast at the start of September, then eased after the first week. The busiest day had more than fifty thousand trades. The top day by swap surplus came one day earlier.

Daily Pons token arbitragePriced trades · Aug 4 - Sep 15, 2026 UTC
Daily gross swap surplus and trade count for Pons token arbitrage on Robinhood Chain
The blue line shows gross swap surplus. The orange line shows the number of trades. September 4 led by surplus; September 5 led by count.

The surge was wide enough to lift both count and dollars. It was still short. The peak passed within days, which is common in thin new pools once more bots find the same gap.

06 · The coinsTwenty tokens carried half the surplus

The spread across coins was steep. Shivolink led, with MUSHROOM in second place. The top five took close to a third of the full sum.

The ten Pons coins with the most swap surplusShared txs split equally across their Pons coins
Top ten Pons tokens ranked by gross swap surplus
The top ten held 39.8% of the measured surplus. The top twenty held 51.8%.
Pons tokenSwap surplus · share
Shivolink · SLINK$295,230 · 11.92%
MUSHROOM · SHROOM$218,143 · 8.81%
ROBINCAT$110,785 · 4.47%
ZZZ$74,895 · 3.02%
Pushin' P$55,440 · 2.24%

When one tx crossed several Pons coins, we split its value between them for this table. That keeps the coin rows equal to the full sum.

07 · The poolsUniswap v4 sat at the center

Almost half the trades stayed within Uniswap v4 pools. Another two fifths crossed between v3 and v4. Together, those paths held nine in ten trades and nearly all swap surplus.

Pool routeTrades · gross surplus
Uniswap v4 pools317,095 · $1.03M
Uniswap v3 + v4254,826 · $1.33M
PancakeSwap v3 + Uniswap v422,155 · $61,648
Uniswap v3 pools16,064 · $17,730

The same exchange can host an arbitrage trade when its pools quote the same coin at different prices. The price gap sits between pools, even when one DEX name appears on both sides.

08 · The traceThe largest swap gain was sent on

The largest tx in the final set booked more than eleven thousand dollars in swap surplus. The exact asset sums are shown below.

Largest txPositive swap balance
WETH4.450078
USDG385.862143
USD value at the daily price$11,472.20

The raw sends add the part the swap table cannot show. The WETH was unwrapped, and the ETH then went to two other addresses. The tx passed every swap test, but the sender did not keep that whole sum.

This is why we call the result swap surplus. It is not a claim about wallet profit. A tx may include a loan payback, a direct tip, or a payment to another party after the swaps finish.

We ran the same check on the ten largest trades. Each swap sum matched the saved figure. Their transfer and call traces also showed flows outside the swaps.

⬢ Audit result
All ten top trades passed the swap math. Their raw sends show why $2.48 million is a swap measure, rather than cash kept by traders.
10 / 10
Top trades matched fresh swap sums
16 / 16
Final data checks passed
0
Pons curve pools in the final set

09 · The limitsWhat the total leaves out

The headline covers the verified Pons v2 launch set. A possible older factory stayed out because we could not prove its link to Pons well enough for a public total.

Only ETH, WETH and the checked USDG coin could price a gain. Trades that finished with another coin stayed out of the dollar sum. Other trades failed the balance check. We did not count either group in the headline total.

Each day's median WETH/USDG DEX price gave us the dollar value of WETH. USDG was set to one dollar. We did not split trades by whether the coin had left its Pons curve at that moment.

Anyone can rerun the DEX side with Bitquery's DEX Trades API. The same raw stream is in Blockchain Data Streaming, and the queries can also be tested through the Bitquery MCP server.

Query Robinhood Chain DEX trades

Track swaps, pools, tokens and tx fees from the same on-chain data used in this study.

Scope, limits and attribution

This analysis covers verified Pons v2 tokens on Robinhood Chain from the first launch on 3 August through 15 September 2026 UTC. It measures token balance changes inside decoded DEX swaps and prices only positive ETH, WETH and verified USDG balances. The totals subtract the sender fee but do not subtract direct transfers, flash-loan repayment, builder payments or off-chain costs. They are swap surplus figures, not claims about wallet profit. The analysis does not identify the people or firms behind any address.

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It reflects analysis of publicly available on-chain data as of the dates given, and does not constitute legal, financial, compliance, tax or investment advice, nor a recommendation or offer to buy, sell or hold any asset. Blockchain addresses are pseudonymous: a transaction between two addresses does not by itself establish the identity, intent or knowledge of any party, and every entity attribution here is an inference that may be incomplete or wrong. Readers should verify independently before acting on anything above, and Bitquery accepts no liability for loss arising from reliance on this material. All trademarks and company names are the property of their respective owners. Corrections and right-of-reply requests go to support@bitquery.io.