On-chain investigationSolana · pump.fun22 October 2026

Only 26% of the money in pump.fun's $100K wins was real trading profit. The rest went to hand-offs and wash loops

Profit trackers are full of pump.fun legends: a few thousand dollars in, millions out. We checked every pump.fun win of $100,000 or more from late October 2025 to August 2026, and asked a simple question about each one. Where did the money really come from?

At a glance
We checked every pump.fun win of $100,000 or more that ended between 30 October 2025 and 30 August 2026: 3,170 wins worth $752.5M as profit trackers count them. Only 26% of that was real trading profit, made by wallets that bought a coin and sold it to other traders. Half went to wallets that sold tokens someone else handed them. Another 13% came from wash loops, where the seller trades with a buyer it is tied to by direct transfers.
26%
Share that was real trading profit (967 wins)
51%
Share that went to wallets handed the tokens
15 of 25
Biggest wins that were wash loops
$752.5M
Profit as trackers count it, across 3,170 wins
Key findingsEach line has its own share link
  1. 26%

    Only $193.9M of the $752.5M in pump.fun wins over $100K was real trading profit.

  2. 15 of 25

    The biggest wins were mostly wash loops: one main buyer, tied to the seller or the coin's creator by direct transfers.

  3. 51%

    Half the money went to wallets that sold tokens another wallet handed them, mostly from the coin's creator side.

  4. $4.92M

    One of the biggest wins, Arena, was paid for by one buyer. The winner had sent that buyer $1.4 million in the two days before.

  5. 25%

    of wash loops ran on coins listed straight on PumpSwap, which are only 12% of big wins.

  6. $3.30M

    The biggest real trade: SOULGUY, bought when the coin was already 71 days old.

A $4,223 trade that turned into $4.92 million

Here is a pump.fun win that would sit near the top of any profit leaderboard. One wallet turned a few thousand dollars into almost $5 million in under an hour. The coin was called Arena. We traced where the money came from.

Almost all of that money came from one other address. That address did 99% of the buying while the winner was selling, and it never sold. In the two days before, the winner had sent that buyer more than 10,000 SOL, about $1.4 million. Everyone else who bought Arena put in about one percent of what the single buyer did.

Arena: the money went in a circleRunning totals over the 57 minutes the winner held the coin
$0M$1M$2M$3M$4M$5M0 min15 min30 min45 min57 min“Winner” took out$4.9MBuying wallet put in$4.9MEveryone else put in$60K
The buying wallet put in $4.86 million and the winner took out $4.92 million. The two lines sit on top of each other. Everyone else put in about $60,000.

Arena's creator was in on it from the start. It sent the winner 32 SOL, then opened a trading pool for Arena with just 0.01 SOL in it. The winner bought in the very next transaction. Six seconds after the last sale, the creator emptied the pool, and the winner sent 480 SOL back to the creator.

So one of the most impressive trades of the past ten months was a wallet selling to a buyer it had helped fund. Traders call this wash trading: trading with yourself so a coin, or a trader's record, looks better than it is.

We found the same pattern behind most of the biggest pump.fun wins. Then we checked every win of six figures or more, more than three thousand of them. Only about a quarter of the money they show was real trading profit.

How a pump.fun win gets counted

Pump.fun is a Solana app where anyone can launch a memecoin in a minute. New coins trade on a simple price curve. Coins that take off move to PumpSwap, pump.fun's own exchange, where they trade in a pool. Anyone can also open a PumpSwap pool for a coin made somewhere else.

Profit trackers and leaderboards score each wallet on each coin. They take what an address got from selling and subtract what it paid to buy. That works for a normal trader. It falls apart when the seller never paid for its coins, or when the buyer on the other side belongs to the seller.

We used that same score to find every wallet that made six figures or more on a single coin. Then we asked three questions about each win. Who bought from the winner? Where did the winner's coins come from? Did any of the wallets involved pay each other?

Where the $752.5M came from3,170 pump.fun wins of $100,000 or more, by what our checks found
Real trades$193.9M · 26% · 967 winsTokens handed over$383.1M · 51% · 1,579 winsWash loops$100.0M · 13% · 278 winsNot proven either way$75.6M · 10% · 346 wins
“Not proven either way” covers wins that fit neither trick: some sold more tokens than they bought without a clear hand-off, and some leaned on one buyer with no proven link.

Real trading profit came to about a quarter. Wallets that were handed their tokens took half, and wash loops took 13%. The last 10% we could not prove either way.

Trick one: the wash loop

A wash loop needs a coin, a thin pool and two wallets with one owner. The seller gets in first: in nine of every ten loops we found, the seller's first buy came within ten seconds of the coin's first trade. Then the buyer soaks up most of the coin, while the seller sells into that buyer and books what looks like a huge profit. Somewhere along the way, money moves straight between the two wallets or through the coin's creator.

How a wash loop worksThe pattern behind Arena and most of the biggest wins
One coin, two linked walletsBuyertakes most of the coinA thin poolsmall buys move the priceSellersells and looks like a winnerDirect transfers link the buyer to the seller or the coin’s creatorA profit tracker sees only the seller’s side, so it lists a big win
Profit trackers only score the seller, so the loop shows up as one big win.

We counted a win as a wash loop when two things were both true. One address did at least half of all the buying while the winner held the coin. And that buyer had sent money to, or received money from, the winner or the coin's creator. 278 wins passed both tests. In those coins, the dominant buyers paid in more than four times as much as all other buyers together.

How many loops you count depends on where you draw the line. If one buyer must do three quarters of the buying, the count falls by about half. But in 13 of the 15 loops among the 25 biggest wins, one buyer did more than 90% of the buying.

The 25 biggest wins, by what we foundNet profit on one coin, October 2025 to August 2026
WhiteWhale$11.6MPENGUIN$7.7MArena$4.9Manon$3.5MDUPE$3.4MCIN$3.4M抖音$3.3MSOULGUY$3.3MPENGUIN$3.0MGUARDS$2.8Msnowball$2.7MANONMOON$2.6MMemeline$2.5MSWEENEY$2.3MBEL$2.1MCWIF$2.0MKMNO$2.0MKMNO$2.0MANSEM$1.9MOPAIUM$1.9MPENGUIN$1.7MBEL$1.6MUOTF$1.6MANSEM$1.6MBTC YZ$1.5MWash loopTokens handed overReal tradeNot proven
15 of the 25 are wash loops and 6 went to wallets handed the tokens. The other 4 are real trades or could not be proven either way.

The loops come in clusters. They run through 46 groups of linked wallets. In the largest group, one buyer took the other side of 38 separate wins. All 278 loops had just 60 different buyers between them.

The loops also favor one shortcut. Coins listed straight on PumpSwap skip pump.fun's launch page, so whoever creates the coin can open its pool with almost no money in it. Those coins make up 12% of the big wins but 25% of the wash loops. Arena was one of them.

Wash loops lean on coins listed straight on PumpSwapShare of all $100K+ wins compared with share of wash loops
Share of all $100K+ wins12%Share of wash loops25%Coins listed straight on PumpSwap, skipping pump.fun’s launch page
A pool that starts with almost no money lets one buyer take most of a coin for very little.

Trick two: the hand-off

The second trick needs no fake buyer. Someone holding a big bag sends tokens to a second address. The second address sells them into the market. On a profit tracker, that address paid nothing and made a fortune.

Half the big wins work this way, and they hold half the money. We followed each seller's tokens one step back.

Where the handed-over tokens came from1,579 wins where most of the tokens sold arrived by transfer
The coin’s creator side1,104A wallet that bought them199A program account (vesting, claim, vault)138Untraced after one step82An exchange, bridge or app56
“Creator side” means the creator sent the tokens, sent them to the address that passed them on, or had direct transfers with that address.

Most hand-offs, 1,104 of them, lead back to the people who made the coin. Half the time, the creator's own address sent the tokens. In most of the rest, the creator sent them to a middle address first, which passed them on. A smaller group came from someone who had bought the tokens on the market, so the sender and the seller together made one ordinary trade, split across two wallets. The rest came out of accounts run by code, such as vesting locks, from exchanges and bridges, or from wallets we could not trace past one step.

Some hand-offs add an extra layer. In 423 creator-side hand-offs, the transfer was signed by an address other than the sender and the seller. On Solana, every wallet that moves tokens in a transaction has to sign it. One transaction in a coin called UOTF shows how this works. A single address and four throwaway wallets sign it together. Each throwaway receives nearly eight million tokens, passes them straight to a seller, and is then closed, all in that one transaction. Only someone holding all five keys, or a group working together, can sign that transaction. One of those sellers later sold once for $1.59 million.

How a hand-off worksOne real UOTF transaction, simplified
Distributorholds the supplyHop walletused once, then closedSellersells onceHop walletused once, then closedSellersells onceHop walletused once, then closedSellersells onceHop walletused once, then closedSellersells onceAll of it in one transaction, signed by the distributor and every hop walletEach seller then shows up on profit trackers as a big winner that bought nothing
So one holder's tokens get sold through many wallets, and each seller looks like a lucky trader.

Hand-offs took over in July

Both tricks surged this summer. Wash loops came in two bursts, one last November and a far bigger one in August, with none at all from January to June. Hand-offs stayed under 100 per month until July, then took over. In August they made up seven in ten of the big wins.

Wins of $100,000 or more, month by monthBy the month the winner first sold
02505007501,0001,2501,500Oct42Nov244Dec173Jan302Feb118Mar78Apr62May195Jun141Jul470Aug1,345Real tradesTokens handed overWash loopsNot proven
Hand-offs stayed under 100 per month until July 2026, then made up seven in ten big wins in August.

Big wins kept coming after August. Another 2,943 six-figure wins ended in the weeks after our transfer records stop on 30 August. That is almost as many again as this whole study, and none of them is in any number here.

Who really got rich on pump.fun

Only 967 wins pass every check. The winner bought the tokens it sold. No single buyer carried the buying. No transfer ties the winner to the other side of its trades.

#CoinWalletProfitPut inTradesHeld
1SOULGUY

4ZHgfd…cpXz

$3.30M$183K3,6322.6 days
2snowball

CD2TNw…m8DG

$2.74M$3,936K440,85398 days
3PENGUIN

7fFCzx…d2Xg

$1.74M$54K612.8 days
4WhiteWhale

EmDewJ…TgxC

$1.44M$5,171K91,340120 days
5Nutcoin

5aHoZz…Fmoa

$1.36M$56K4915 min
6Chonketha

Apshcq…b2Js

$1.29M$6K24 hours
7Nutcoin113

3jMvFN…n48k

$1.23M$55K1412 min
8PENGUIN

697jHR…cJHA

$1.13M$268K61712 days
9BLUECHIP

DEhkPX…6QKJ

$1.12M$8K812 min
10WOFI

4BHh2w…oLux

$0.99M$9K215 hours

The best real trade in our ten months of data is SOULGUY. A trader bought into a coin that was already more than two months old and made $3.30 million over about two and a half days. It traded roughly once a minute, so software probably did the clicking.

Two more names on the list are high-speed trading bots, with tens of thousands of trades or more. Four others were in and out in under four hours. Fast trades like these often come from snipers, or from launch bundles, where a coin's creator packs buys into its first block. We covered both in our look at pump.fun launch bundles and snipers. Passing our checks means the trade was real. Whether the winner was an outsider, rather than someone close to the launch, is a separate question.

Big real wins are rare. Most pump.fun buyers never see one: our study of Solana memecoin buyers found that about three in four lose money.

Why stage a win at all?

The chain records what these wallets did. Their reasons are a guess, and none of the ones below is proven here. An address with a giant PnL attracts copy traders and paying followers. Big wins and big volume push a coin onto trending lists. Selling through other wallets keeps a coin's "dev sold" warning from lighting up on trading apps. And passing money through a coin can blur where it came from.

The two tricks share people. 22% of the wallets in wash loops also sold, sent or signed hand-offs. We have seen the same moves on other chains, in our wash trading study across six chains.

How to check a pump.fun win yourself

You can test any big win with four questions, using a block explorer or the tool below.

  • Who bought from the winner? If one buyer took most of what the winner sold, be careful.
  • Where did the winner's tokens come from? An address that received its tokens by transfer did not trade its way to that profit.
  • Do the wallets pay each other? Direct SOL transfers between the winner, the buyer and the creator are the clearest tell.
  • How deep was the pool? A pool that opened with almost no money in it makes a staged trade cheap.

How we counted

We started from every address that made six figures or more on one coin launched on pump.fun or listed straight on PumpSwap, over the ten months to 30 August 2026. We left out coins with fewer than 500 trades. For each win, we looked at who bought from the winner while it held the coin, where the coins it sold came from, and whether the wallets involved paid each other. We checked more than ninety cases against the chain itself. A separate rebuild of every count, written from the rules alone, matched every one. An account that pays other people's trading fees, and that our records wrongly credit with their trades, was left out.

Limits on these figures

The study ends at the last sale on 30 August 2026, the last day of our transfer records. Wins that ended later are not in the study.

Only coins with at least 500 lifetime trades are included. Smaller coins can be washed too, so every count of staged wins here is a minimum.

Hand-offs are traced one step back. Longer chains show up as untraced. Positions where our records name the wrong address as the trader were removed when we found them.

A wash loop needs both one dominant buyer and a direct transfer between the wallets. Wins with a dominant buyer but no transfer are counted as not proven.

Profit is what an address got from selling minus what it paid to buy on that coin, in US dollars at the time of each trade. Transaction fees are not deducted.

Run it yourself

Check any pump.fun win before you trust it

Every trade and transfer in this story comes from Bitquery's Solana data. The Bitquery MCP server puts that data behind an AI assistant, so you can ask who bought from a wallet, where its tokens came from, or which wallets paid each other, without writing a query. The full history of Solana trades is also sold as files on the Bitquery Data Store.

See who bought from any wallet on any coinTrace where a wallet's tokens came fromFind wallets that send each other SOLCheck which wallets funded a buyer
Explore Bitquery MCP →Figures measured from Solana DEX trades and token transfers, 30 October 2025 to 30 August 2026, checked on 22 October 2026.

FAQ

Who made the most money on pump.fun?

The biggest genuine win we found was $3.30 million, on SOULGUY. Bigger wins show up on leaderboards, such as Arena's, but our checks show most of the largest ones were wash loops or wallets selling tokens they were handed.

Are pump.fun profit leaderboards accurate?

They treat any address that sold for more than it paid as a winner, however it got its tokens. Across every pump.fun win of six figures or more, only about a quarter of the money was profit from real trading. The rest went to wallets that were handed their tokens, to wash loops, or to wins we could not prove either way.

What is wash trading on pump.fun?

It is trading with yourself to fake profit or volume. In the pattern we tested, one buyer takes most of what the winner sells, and that buyer has direct transfers with the winner or the coin's creator. We found 278 such wins.

What is a token hand-off?

Someone who holds a lot of a coin sends tokens to a second address, and that address sells them. Profit trackers see a seller that paid nothing and made a fortune. In most hand-offs, the tokens traced back to the wallets that launched the coin.

How much of the profit in big pump.fun wins was real?

About a quarter of it. Of every four dollars that profit trackers would show as a big pump.fun win, roughly one came from a wallet that paid for its coins and sold them to other traders.

Why does this study stop on 30 August 2026?

Our records of token transfers end on that date, and every check here needs them. Another 2,943 big wins ended later and are not included.

Legal disclaimer

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and reflects analysis of publicly available on-chain data as of the dates indicated. It does not constitute legal, financial, compliance, or investment advice, and nothing in it is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any token or asset.

Wallets are grouped by what they did on the chain. None of them is attributed to a named person or group. Possible reasons for the patterns described are stated as possibilities only.

Reported by Gaurav Agarwal for Bitquery Research, with AI tools; every figure was checked against the raw data.

Nothing herein should be relied upon as a definitive determination of fact. Readers should conduct their own independent verification before taking any action. The authors and publisher accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this material. All trademarks and company names are the property of their respective owners.