The week $12 billion left Aave
The hack itself is well documented. What it did to everyone else on Aave is not. We followed every deposit, withdrawal and loan on its main market, hour by hour, through the week after.
- $12.4B
- $2.1B
- 75x
- 14%
- $1.5M
- 78%
01 · The triggerA bridge hack, in brief
Aave is the biggest lender on Ethereum, with more than half of all the money lent there, as our look at Ethereum lending since 2021 shows. People deposit crypto to earn interest, and others borrow against crypto of their own. In April 2026 a hack at another project sent a shock through it.
rsETH is Kelp DAO's token for restaked ETH. On April 18, an attacker fooled the bridge that carries rsETH between chains into paying out almost $300 million of it on Ethereum, as CoinDesk reported. The attacker had put nothing in to get them.
On Ethereum the attacker moved fast. The release landed at 17:35 UTC. Within seven minutes the rsETH was split across seven wallets. Two of them posted it on Aave and borrowed WETH against it, and another did the same on Compound.
| Lender | rsETH | Borrowed | Loss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aave | 53,400 | 52,835 WETH | $124.5M |
| Compound | 17,426 | 11,963 WETH* | $39.2M |
Aave froze its rsETH markets within hours. In May both lenders closed the loans, valuing the attacker's rsETH at close to nothing, and wrote them off. That was the direct bill, about $164 million. The bigger shock came from everyone else on Aave.
02 · The first hoursDepositors start to leave
Before the hack, the market was quiet that Saturday. No hour saw even $50 million leave. Then, in a single hour that evening, less than two hours after the borrowing, $2.1 billion left.
On April 18 and 19 together, $8.3 billion went out, against about $1 billion on a normal day the week before. At that point nobody knew how much bad debt the lender would be left with.
03 · The weekMoney out, rates up
The outflow ran for a week. Over those seven days, deposits minus withdrawals came to minus $12.4 billion, about thirty times the week before. That was Aave's TVL walking out the door.
A lender's rates rise as its cash runs low. Here the cost to borrow USDC and USDT jumped from about 3.5% per year to 14%, and stayed there for four to five days. WETH went from 2.3% to 8.4%.
| Asset | Before | Peak | Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| USDC | 3.5% | 14.0% | 4 |
| USDT | 3.5% | 14.0% | 5 |
| WETH | 2.3% | 8.3% | 2 |
04 · Who leftStablecoins first
| Asset | Net out |
|---|---|
| USDT | $2.49B |
| wstETH | $1.76B |
| USDC | $1.39B |
| weETH | $1.06B |
| WETH | $1.02B |
| USDe | $976.98M |
| WBTC | $890.97M |
| cbBTC | $859.94M |
| Others | $1.92B |
| All | $12.35B |
Stablecoins made up half of what left, led by USDT and USDC. ETH in its various forms and wrapped bitcoin followed. Some of this was ordinary depositors taking cash out. Some was borrowers unwinding. They repaid their loans and took their collateral with them, and loans on the main market shrank by $4.1 billion in the same week.
05 · No cascadeHardly anyone was liquidated
A run on a lender can set off a spiral of forced sales. This one did not. ETH's price fell no more than 7% that week, and loans there were liquidated for just $1.5 million in total. Nearly all of the money that left, left by choice.
Those who stayed paid for it. Anyone borrowing stablecoins paid four times the usual rate for most of a week.
06 · AfterFive months on
Deposits on the main market were worth $33.0 billion at the end of March, already down from $41.1 billion in January as ETH fell. In April they dropped to $20.3 billion even though ETH rose, so that fall was money leaving. They hit $16.7 billion at the end of June, when ETH was near its low for the year. By September 22 they were back to $25.8 billion, still about a fifth below March, with ETH worth almost a third more than it was then.
These are month-end values, so they move with prices. The outflow figures above do not, because each day's flows are counted at that day's price. A separate rsETH incident in September, a Safe module drain, had nothing to do with the bridge.
07 · The billThe loss and the run
So what did the rsETH hack cost Aave? The hack itself left Aave and Compound on Ethereum with about $164 million of bad debt, the most booked on Ethereum's lenders in our data since 2021. The run it set off moved about 75 times as much money out of Aave in a week. It made borrowing four times as dear, and five months later the deposits still had not all come back.
For Aave, the hack was the smaller shock. The fear that followed it was the bigger one.
08 · How we measuredWhat we counted, and what we left out
We read every deposit, withdrawal, loan and repayment on Aave v3's main market on Ethereum from its own on-chain events and valued each at that day's price from Aave's oracle. Times are Ethereum block times in UTC. We traced the rsETH from the bridge to the lenders with public transfer logs.
We did not measure other chains, the lender's other markets, or where the attacker went after borrowing. The hack itself, and who was behind it, are covered in the reporting we link.
09 · The recordThe contracts behind the numbers
| Contract | Address |
|---|---|
| Aave v3 Pool | 0x8787…a4e2 |
| rsETH token | 0xa129…e5a7 |
| rsETH bridge adapter | 0x85d4…8ef3 |
| First receiving wallet | 0x8b1b…0d3b |
| Aave borrower | 0x1f4c…adef |
| Compound borrower | 0xeba7…129b |
| Compound v3 WETH | 0xa175…ae94 |
| Compound v3 wstETH | 0x3d0b…afe3 |
Watch a lender in plain English
Every figure above came from data anyone can query. The Bitquery MCP server puts it behind an AI assistant, so you can ask how much left a lender in the last hour, what it costs to borrow a stablecoin right now, or where a wallet sent what it borrowed, without writing the query yourself.
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and reflects analysis of publicly available on-chain data as of the dates indicated. It does not constitute legal, financial, compliance, or investment advice.
The findings describe activity on Aave v3's main market and Compound v3 on Ethereum, measured from on-chain events and valued at daily oracle prices. Other chains and markets are not measured. Month-end deposit values move with prices.
References to Aave, Kelp DAO, Compound, Euler and any other party describe contract state and on-chain activity. Wallets are identified by address only; nothing here states who controls them. Details of the hack itself come from the linked reporting.
Nothing herein should be relied upon as a definitive determination of fact. Readers should conduct their own independent verification before taking any action. The authors and publisher accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this article.