On-chain investigationSolanaWash tradingSybil / memecoins

The token factory: 6,018 buyers, one wallet, a #1 trending coin

6,018 buyers, $2M in volume, no real holders — and a new one shipped almost every day. Using Bitquery's Solana transfer and DEX trade data, we traced America250 back to a single operator who owns 99.3% of the supply.

At a glance
At dawn UTC on June 24, America250 looked like a crowd that beat you to the trade: 6,018 holders, $2M in volume, a $5.5M market cap in under five hours. Every number was manufactured by one operator. About 6,000 of the buyers were funded by the same handful of hubs — one of them the deployer. Thirty bots round-tripped the volume in a circle. And 99.3% of the supply sits in a single, unlocked wallet. The same wallet has held ~99% of a new patriotic-sounding token almost every day for eleven days.
6,018
"buyers" — nearly all funded by the same hubs
$2M / $22K
"Volume" vs. real SOL that actually stayed
99.3%
Of supply in one unlocked wallet
~26
Tokens shipped in 11 days, same playbook

If you were watching the Solana trending lists at dawn UTC on June 24, you saw it. America250: green candles stacked like a staircase, a market cap near $5.5 million in under five hours, more than 6,000 wallets already holding, two million dollars of volume scrolling past on the screener. It had the one thing every memecoin trader is trained to chase — the look of a crowd that got there before you did.

It was a set piece. Every number on that screen was built on purpose by one person, and the chain kept the receipts. We pulled every transfer and every swap for America250 from the block it was born, traced the SOL backward through the wallets that funded it, and cross-checked the two datasets against each other. This was not a sloppy pump that happened to get washed. It was a factory — the same operator had already shipped roughly 26 tokens in eleven days, each in a different patriotic costume, each reaching the same ~6,000 wallets that were never people.

One war chest of ~918 SOL fans out to a deployer, ~30 wash bots and ~6,000 puppet wallets; the mint and pool manufacture a market; 99.3% of supply lands in one unlocked wallet. Every number traders saw was manufactured by one operator.

01 — Thirty secondsThe launch took thirty seconds

Here is how a "viral" coin gets born when nobody is actually there. The bots were funded before the coin existed. The "liquidity" was siphoned back out in the same block it went in. By the time the token showed up on your screener as a fresh launch worth aping, the float that could actually trade was about seven million tokens — roughly $40,000 of a five-million-dollar "market cap."

The birth of America250 — block by block03:41:20 → 03:42:32 UTC
03:41:20
917.9 SOL relayed into the treasury
A single-use relay moves ~$63,000 — the operation's entire working capital — into the war chest G3DwCd…
+33s
~24 SOL each sprayed into 30 fresh wallets
Then 153.8 SOL is handed to the deployer 6oezH5… — nine seconds before it mints.
03:42:02
Deployer mints 1,000,000,001 tokens
The entire supply is created in a single transaction.
+30s
99.3% siphoned straight back out
The whole supply goes into the Pumpswap pool, which immediately sends 993,023,929 tokens into one wallet — where it has sat untouched ever since.
Read the timeline again: the bots were funded before the coin existed, and the "liquidity" left in the same block it arrived.

02 — The crowdThe 6,000 holders were one person

The holder count is the number that gets retail to click. America250 showed 6,018 of them in five hours — the kind of distribution that whispers "organic, too many people to be a scam." So we asked the only question that matters: where did those wallets get their SOL? They got it from the same place.

Buyer funding overlap — the crowd shares funders6,050 buyers profiled
Of ~6,050 buyers, how many were funded by the same hubs
Funded by 5–6 of the same hubs
~6,000
Funded by all six hubs
2,903
Seeded directly by the deployer
~6,000
~0.011 SOL each
The deployer seeded ~6,000 wallets with just enough SOL for rent and gas before those wallets "bought." Independent traders do not share five funders. Exchange withdrawals do not overlap like that.
The crowd was a costume rack: one operator, six thousand sock puppets, funded in waves and pointed at the buy button on cue.

03 — The volumeThe volume that wasn't

If the holders were fake, the volume had to be too — and it was the cheapest part to fake. The pool took in 29,526 SOL and paid out 29,209 SOL. Roughly two million dollars sloshed each way; about $22,000 actually stayed. The rest went in a circle, and the circle was thirty bots.

$2 million in volume. $22,000 real.pool flow · net settlement
SOL into pool (buys)29,526 SOL
SOL out of pool (sells)29,209 SOL
317 SOLnet (~$22k) actually stayed
About 99% of the "volume" was wash trading — SOL going round in a circle and ending almost exactly where it started.
~30 bots round-tripped ~66% of the entire supply, net ~0. Each bought and sold the same 20–25 million tokens over and over, ending the session almost exactly flat.
Atomic wash
We found single transactions where one bot bought exactly what another bot sold, in the same instruction — an atomic wash pair. (The trade feed's own buy/sell tags were unreliable; we read direction from the pool's settlement layer instead.)
That is where the trending rank came from — not real demand, just a handful of bots playing tennis with the operator's own SOL.
Run this analysis yourself

The same Solana data, one MCP prompt away

We scoped every America250 transfer by mint, traced SOL funding backward through shared hubs, and joined DEX trades by transaction signature — holder concentration, wash volume, and Sybil overlap came back in plain English through Bitquery MCP. No GraphQL to hand-write.

solana_transfersdex_tradesfunding_traceholder_concentrationpool_flow_direction

04 — The reserve99.3% in one hand, and it isn't locked

The generous reading of that 993-million-token reserve would be "locked liquidity." It isn't. The wallet holding 99.3% of the supply signs its own transactions — it has paid network fees on dozens of them, going back a week before America250 existed. That makes it a live keypair, not a program-owned vault. One signature empties it.

Who owns America2501,000,000,001 total supply
F4UE9 — one wallet, unlocked
993,023,929 tokens · signs its own transactions
99.30%
AMM pool float
the only supply that can actually trade
0.42%
Fee sinks
protocol & routing fees
0.11%
Wash-bot dust
held by the ~30 trading bots
~0.10%
~6,000 "retail" wallets
the entire visible "crowd," combined
<0.10%
Magnified — the 0.70% that isn't the reserve
The non-reserve slices are too small to see above. Exploded, they look like this — 6,018 buyers split the grey sliver.
AMM pool float
0.42%
Fee sinks
0.11%
Wash-bot dust
~0.10%
~6,000 retail
<0.10%
Tradable float ~7,000,000 tokens (~$40,000)of a ~$5,500,000 "market cap."
On a forty-thousand-dollar float, that wallet is the market — and it can leave the moment the real money it's fishing for shows up.
⬢ The reserve · not locked
F4UE9 — 993,023,929 tokens (99.3% of supply)
No lock
a plain wallet, not a vesting or lock contract
Signs its own tx
paid fees on dozens, back a week before launch
1 signature
is all it takes to empty it onto the market

05 — The factoryYesterday it was the United States Oil Trust

This is the part that should change how you read every trending list. That same 99.3%-reserve wallet has played the identical role for a new token almost every day — receiving ~99% of one fresh launch after another, going back eleven days. The names tell you the plan: strategic oil, national trusts, sovereign-sounding funds, then America250, named for the country's 250th birthday.

The factory: a new fake token almost every dayJun 17 → Jun 24, 2026

~26 tokens in 11 days. Each drew the same ~5,000–5,800 wallet "crowd" — the same army redeployed daily. Marker size ≈ peak "market cap."

$14.9M
SAOS
Strategic American Oil Supply
$41.1M
USOT
United States Oil Trust
$31.9M
AAIF
American AI Fund
$49.7M
Wojak
wojak
$21.5M
ZINC
ZINC
$1.7M
PACT
Public Asset Control Treaty
◆ the token we traced
$5.5M
America250
America250
Jun 17
Jun 18
Jun 19
Jun 20
Jun 21
Jun 23
Jun 24

Showing the last 4 days — view wider for the full 7-day run.

One wallet connects all of them. F4UE9 received ~99% of the reserve on every single one of these launches.
"Yesterday it was the United States Oil Trust. Tomorrow, something new."
The branding is meant to feel patriotic and institutional — the opposite of a meme — so it does not pattern-match to "rug" in your head.

06 — Follow the moneyThe war chest that breathes

The whole operation runs on roughly 918 SOL — about $63,000 — and it never has to grow. Each day it moves through a brand-new, single-use relay wallet into that day's hub, fans out to the deployer, the bots, and the six thousand puppets, then the bots and puppets sweep their leftover SOL back up so the chest can be rebuilt for tomorrow. We couldn't find an exchange wallet at the root — just a chain of fresh throwaway addresses. The money launders itself in a loop and resets at sunrise.

So who is the mark? Anyone whose SOL is real. So far only about $22,000 in genuine outside capital looks like it got trapped in America250 — small, probably because this performance hadn't hooked a whale yet. But the machine doesn't need to win every night. It needs to win once, when enough real traders ape a "$40M United States Oil Trust" and the 99.3% reserve finally hits sell.

07 — Defend yourselfHow to spot the next one before you're the exit

You don't need our database. You need three habits.

1
Read the holder distribution, not the holder count
Six thousand holders means nothing if the top wallet has 99%. Pull the top holders. If one address that isn't the AMM vault holds the supply, you're looking at a loaded gun.
2
Check whether "liquidity" is actually locked
If the dominant holder is a plain wallet that signs transactions — not a lock contract or a program vault — it can dump in one click.
3
Sample where the buyers got funded
Click five holders. If their SOL traces back to the same one or two wallets, or to the deployer, the crowd is a costume. Real crowds have messy, unrelated funding. Sybil crowds share a wallet.

America250 failed all three in its first five minutes. So did the United States Oil Trust. So will tomorrow's.

How we did it

Two Bitquery datasets, linked and cross-checked

Solana Transfers gave us the settlement record — we scoped every America250 movement by its mint, classified each buy or sell from the token's direction in and out of the pool, rebuilt balances, and traced SOL funding backward to its hubs. Solana DEX Trades surfaced the coin while it was trending. We joined the two by transaction signature and re-derived concentration, wash trading, and Sybil funding a second, independent way.

solana_transfersdex_tradespool_flow_directionfunding_traceholder_concentrationaddress_labels
Buy/sell read from pool flow, not the trade-side label; counts adjusted for fee-routing and bundled transactions.

See through the next "trending" coin in seconds

Connect Bitquery MCP to Claude, Cursor, or any MCP client — ask in plain English for Solana transfers, DEX trades, holder concentration, and funding traces. The same datasets behind this investigation, no GraphQL to hand-write.

What we are not claiming · legal disclaimer

The "same operator" conclusion is an inference from on-chain funding structure: ~6,000 buyer wallets, each funded by five or six shared hubs, one of them the deployer. It is not a real-world identity, and we make no attempt to establish one.

USD figures assume roughly $69 per SOL; the SOL figures are exact. We can't read mint or freeze authority from transfer data alone — what we can confirm is that supply has been fixed at one billion since genesis and the token isn't globally frozen. The genuine outside money trapped so far is at most about 317 SOL, and we can't fully separate how much of that is real versus the operator seeding its own pool.

This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and reflects analysis of publicly available on-chain data as of the date indicated. It does not constitute legal, financial, compliance, or investment advice. Blockchain addresses are pseudonymous, and the presence of a transaction between two addresses does not by itself establish the identity, intent, or knowledge of any party. All trademarks and names are the property of their respective owners.